Public health officials’ Guide to Practical Law
Do you know how the law helped make workplaces safer or improved the safety of motor vehicles or vaccinations? The majority of the most significant advances in public health made in the 20th century involved legal reform or litigation. Understanding public health law and how to apply it is crucial for public health leaders and experts if they want to keep the public healthy Practical Law. This 90-minute online course, which draws on the expertise of public health officials and lawyers who have worked with them, is intended to assist public health leaders and professionals in identifying legal issues, cooperating productively with legal counsel, and comprehending their legal obligations and authority. By the end Practical Law, you will be able to employ fundamental principles of public health legislation to more successfully safeguard the general public’s health while avoiding legal entanglements.
Objectives for Learning
Define essential public health law principles. Identify key public health laws that regulate leadership’s duties, powers, and restrictions. Recognize legal issues.Practical Law Develop legal questions. Put into practise effective techniques for dealing with legal counsel.
Governmental public health professionals and executives who have not received proper legal training.
Only for instructional purposes, this course is not meant to be a replacement for qualified legal or other advice. While all reasonable efforts have been made to verify Legal authority, regulations, and the veracity of these materials may differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. If you have any doubts about the law Practical Law, you should always consult an attorney or other knowledgeable practitioner.
This online course features interactive activities that are Flash-based and should be finished in around 90 minutes.
Western Institutional Review Board Regulatory Counsel Jeffrey Killip, JD, MPH Principal, Killip Consulting, LLC
Northwest Center for Public Health Practice Director Susan Allan, MD, JD, MPH
requirements for technology
You must install specific software and browser plugins in order to take this course Practical Law. To learn more, see our Technical Requirements page.Practical Law
Applying traditional legal remedies to digital assets in Hong Kong: Demystifying cryptocurrency
The Court of First Instance has now rendered a decision in the trial of Nico Constantijn v. Stive Jean-Paul Dan  HKCFI 1254, one of the first cases in Hong Kong in which the court granted freezing injunctions over bitcoins.
The defendant served as the plaintiff’s sales agent for the plaintiff’s bitcoins, the court ruled. The court determined that by neglecting to give the plaintiff an accounting for the bitcoins and the pertinent sales proceeds, the defendant had violated his fiduciary obligations Practical Law. The court determined that the defendant retained the unsold bitcoins, the money received from the sale of the bitcoins, and any associated benefits on trust for the plaintiff.
Given the recent decline in bitcoin prices, it is critical for businesses to protect their investments in cryptocurrencies and to be aware of their legal options in the event of a dispute Practical Law.
To reduce the danger of financial losses, businesses should implement proper protections while engaged in cryptocurrency trading and other similar activities. These include putting in place contingency plans for dealing with financial fraud/crime, keeping thorough records of transfers, and capturing the parameters of the transaction in a written agreement.
Nico Constantijn versus Stive According to Jean-Paul Dan, cryptocurrency is a novel asset class that is subject to the same legal rules regarding trusts and injunctions. These legal options continue to be crucial recovery and compensation tools for cryptocurrency fraud victims Practical Law. Businesses can now rely on the court with more assurance to issue relief and help them recover and safeguard their digital assets.
Relevance in Real Life
Following is a summary of the case’s practical implications:
- it is critical to preserve statistics of cryptocurrency transfers. Having the transaction identification for a transaction will mean that the information of the transaction may be validated on the general public blockchain Practical Law, which include the type of cryptocurrency transferred, the quantity of cryptocurrency transferred, the moving wallet deal with, the receiving pockets cope with and when the transfer become effected.
- it’s miles crucial to securely keep non-public keys and seed terms as these are required to guard and maintain get entry to to cryptocurrency wallets. lack of the non-public keys and the seed word for a wallet will mean that the pockets (and any cryptocurrency stored in that pockets) can no longer be accessed.
- 4 Upon the invention of fraud, it’s far vital to act unexpectedly and don’t forget whether an software need to be made for a freezing injunction. Delays in applying for a freezing injunction can also hinder the prospects of efficaciously acquiring an injunction. If the cryptocurrency transfers contain anonymous parties, Practical Law it is able to additionally be important to are seeking disclosure programs towards 0.33 parties (along with cryptocurrency exchanges) to become aware of the parties concerned and different applicable records Practical Law.
Given the fast-changing tendencies in virtual assets, it is all of the more important that corporations and sufferers of cryptocurrency fraud act promptly in seeking criminal advice and taking the important criminal steps.